Match on “Shutterstock Editorial” source #4395
Merged
+5
−4
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
andrew-nowak
approved these changes
Jan 10, 2025
prout-bot
added
Pending-on-cropper
Pending-on-leases
Pending-on-media-api
Pending-on-image-loader
Pending-on-metadata-editor
Pending-on-collections
Pending-on-usage
Pending-on-kahuna
Pending-on-auth
Pending-on-thrall
Seen-on-auth
Seen-on-leases
Seen-on-usage
and removed
Pending-on-cropper
Pending-on-leases
Pending-on-media-api
Pending-on-image-loader
Pending-on-metadata-editor
Pending-on-collections
Pending-on-usage
Pending-on-kahuna
Pending-on-auth
Pending-on-thrall
labels
|
Seen on auth, usage, image-loader, metadata-editor, thrall, leases, cropper, collections, media-api, kahuna (created by @paperboyo and merged by @andrew-nowak 8 minutes and 42 seconds ago) Please check your changes! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this change?
Friends at Shutterstock changed
sourcefield of images at their portal to have a new value ofShutterstock Editorial, so manual uploads (only) weren’t matching and nobody told us. This corrects it. The matching, that is.How should a reviewer test this change?
Concoct an image with
source:Shutterstock Editorial(or download from Shutterstock), upload and see if it’s recognised correctly.How can success be measured?
Editorial colleagues don’t need to manually assign rights.
Who should look at this?
Tested? Documented?