Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: nft stargaze #82

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

feat: nft stargaze #82

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

ratik
Copy link
Collaborator

@ratik ratik commented Jan 16, 2025

ALTER TABLE user_points ADD nft_mul NUMERIC;
[protocols.stargaze-stamps]
type = "nft"
source = "stargaze"
rpc = "https://stargaze-rpc.polkachu.com:443/"
jitter = 1000
concurrency_limit = 10
contract = "stars1h4lzfpcyr38yj9mysnzqy8360tt3uggmdfukgrutgmck53rn9r9sj2qg9q"
[protocols.stargaze-stamps.assets.dATOM]
multiplier = 1.1
[protocols.stargaze-stamps.assets.dTIA]
multiplier = 1.1

@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ program
.description('Prepare tasks for processing sources')
.option('-t --timestamp <timestamp>', 'Timestamp to use')
.option('-s --simulate', 'Just simulate the task')
.action(async (options) => {
.action((options) => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why did you remove async?

{
all_tokens: {
start_after,
limit: 100,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is better to use const variable for 100

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants