Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add snforge to dev-dependency #32

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Sep 6, 2024
Merged

Conversation

byteZorvin
Copy link
Contributor

  • [x ] issue # Cannot add piltover as dependency due to conflicting dependency of sn_forge

One could not add piltover as a dependency due to conflicting dependency of sn_forge, if they are on a later version.
This can be solved by adding sn_forge as a dev-dependency and not dependency

update scarb and oz version
add lib target
Copy link
Collaborator

@glihm glihm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch on that, could you ensure that the new OZ version is not breaking everything and new visibility is correctly handled. 👍 Thanks you!

@byteZorvin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sure, let me get back on this

- fixed oz visibility
- updated sn_forge version due to failing compilation from sierra to
casm(to consume USC output)
@byteZorvin
Copy link
Contributor Author

  • Have updated to fix the testcases.
  • Had to update the starknet foundry version, as it was incompatible due to compilation from Sierra to Casm failing

- Failing to deploy contracts with older version
@byteZorvin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @glihm, please do check this as well !!

@byteZorvin byteZorvin requested a review from glihm September 5, 2024 09:44
Copy link
Collaborator

@glihm glihm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you a lot @byteZorvin for the initial push on the version. 🚀

@glihm glihm merged commit a40db0b into keep-starknet-strange:main Sep 6, 2024
3 checks passed
@glihm glihm mentioned this pull request Sep 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants