Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: print all resources #78
feat: print all resources #78
Changes from all commits
f0b9fc2
25cff88
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we leave some version of the old name (
ToGatewayAPIResources
) and return[]client.Object, []client.Object, error
? GetResources does not really reflect what the function is doingThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
or
[]GatewayResources, []client.Object, error
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we add a small function comment, also mention the order it returns the resources
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
haven't thought much about it, but what are your thoughts on this approach VS every provider registers the resources he cares about in
init()
.I am not sure what I prefer, slight preference to what you currently have but wanted to discuss this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Trying to think if there is a different way to do it. I less like the fact that every provider needs to register its resources and that we depends on it.. I have not thought on anything smart yet.
But.. we should have all the resources the provider cares about (which are the resources that we need to filter out from the file) in its
storage
.. Maybe we can leverage that?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess we can add a
GetCRDs()
method to theprovider
interface. We have access to all the providers ini2gw
package, so we can do the registration in this package. Instead of having each one registering his own CRDsThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I followed @levikobi's suggestion and added a
GetCRDs
method to the provider interface. Let me know if it looks better now. In that case, I'll add documentation about the new method for the providers to implement.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
similar comment below on how we handle,
provider == kong
but ingress is gce. The implemented approach here would not print the gce ingress (although it hasn't been converted)