-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 617
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Only install fuse-sshfs from epel #3096
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
c427380
to
35e2efd
Compare
The installation of epel-release-next was actually excluded by Requires: redhat-release >= %{version}
# epel-release is only for enterprise linux, not fedora
Conflicts: fedora-release
# crb needs config-manager to run
# But only recommend it, incase people do not need crb
Recommends: dnf-command(config-manager)
%if %{with next}
Recommends: (epel-next-release if centos-stream-release)
%endif So if you do a
Then you can choose to disable it, or enable both of them (as epel-next requires epel)
But this only happens on CentOS Stream (i.e. Next), not on Enterprise Linux (e.g. AlmaLinux) Since it is stable, it only has |
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
Needs rebase |
The other packages are available in the system distribution. The extra packages (from EPEL) should not be used for them. Signed-off-by: Anders F Björklund <[email protected]>
dfeafa4
to
3864f16
Compare
Before (iptables-legacy)
After (iptables-nft)
|
The other packages are available in the system distribution.
The extra packages (from EPEL) should not be used for them.
Note: Fedora EPEL means "Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux"
For CentOS Stream, the repository is actually called "EPEL-Next"
The regular "EPEL" repository was used for CentOS Linux only.
But we won't bother with that, until it is actually needed by Lima...
In RHEL 8
sshfs
was available in PowerTools, so support that as well.Closes #2979
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/