Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade alpine from 3.17 to 3.18.3 #1527

Closed

Conversation

nr-security-github
Copy link
Contributor

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Keeping your Docker base image up-to-date means you’ll benefit from security fixes in the latest version of your chosen image.

Changes included in this PR

  • build/package/Dockerfile

We recommend upgrading to alpine:3.18.3, as this image has only 0 known vulnerabilities. To do this, merge this pull request, then verify your application still works as expected.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 25, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (5ef8024) 47.42% compared to head (f68a96b) 47.49%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1527      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   47.42%   47.49%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         125      125              
  Lines        7751     7751              
==========================================
+ Hits         3676     3681       +5     
+ Misses       3934     3930       -4     
+ Partials      141      140       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mbazhlekova mbazhlekova closed this Jan 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants