Fixing OTEL Processor wrong snippet for memory_limiter

[lbac-redhat]

Version(s):
4.12, 4.13, 4.14, 4.15, 4.16, 4.17, 4.18

Issue:
N/A

Link to docs preview:
N/A

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Additional information:
Fixes minor copy/paste error - the memory_limiter processor is not used in the snippet because it references the batch processor instead.

[openshift-ci]

Hi @lbac-redhat. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[xenolinux]

/ok-to-test

[ocpdocs-previewbot]

🤖 Thu Jan 09 10:34:37 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://86839--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/observability/otel/otel-collector/otel-collector-processors.html

[openshift-ci]

@lbac-redhat: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.