Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add initial version of python bindings #252

Open
wants to merge 20 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add initial version of python bindings #252

wants to merge 20 commits into from

Conversation

sovrasov
Copy link
Collaborator

What does this PR do?

  • uses nanobind to construct the bindings
  • covers classification
  • bindings are optional to avoid unnecessary side-effects in other projects that use model_api/cpp

Fixes # (issue)

Before submitting

  • This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the other checks if that's the case).
  • Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes?
  • Did you write any new necessary tests?

@sovrasov sovrasov requested a review from mgumowsk January 10, 2025 11:18
@github-actions github-actions bot added cpp C++ related changes python python related changes build Related to build scripts labels Jan 10, 2025
mgumowsk
mgumowsk previously approved these changes Jan 10, 2025
View reviewed changes
model_api/cpp/py_bindings/CMakeLists.txt Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
# Copyright (C) 2024 Intel Corporation
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

2025 :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@mgumowsk mgumowsk mgumowsk left review comments

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
build Related to build scripts cpp C++ related changes python python related changes
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@sovrasov @mgumowsk