Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use generic release workflow #132

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 6, 2024
Merged

Use generic release workflow #132

merged 3 commits into from
Dec 6, 2024

Conversation

achour94
Copy link
Contributor

@achour94 achour94 commented Dec 5, 2024

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?

No

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Migrates the release workflow from a repository-specific implementation to using a generic reusable workflow from powsybl/github-ci repository

What is the current behavior?

Repository uses a custom release workflow definition

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

Repository now uses the generic release-frontend-lib-generic.yml workflow from powsybl/github-ci

Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?

  • Yes
  • No

If yes, please check if the following requirements are fulfilled

  • The Breaking Change or Deprecated label has been added
  • The migration steps are described in the following section

What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR? (migration steps)

Other information:

@achour94 achour94 self-assigned this Dec 5, 2024
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 5, 2024

@achour94 achour94 merged commit 5eb0c5b into main Dec 6, 2024
6 checks passed
@achour94 achour94 deleted the use-generic-release branch December 6, 2024 09:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants