Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EPMRPP-90161 || Implement screenshot attachment support for Jest agent #140

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 28, 2024

Conversation

AliakseiLiasnitski
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@AmsterGet AmsterGet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will it work for parallel execution as well?
Also please resolve conflicts.

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
src/index.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/reporter.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/reporter.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/reporter.js Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@AmsterGet AmsterGet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Regarding

Will it work for parallel execution as well?

I checked the execution with jest concurrent option and got an error.

image

In this case the entire report cannot be created.

I guess the solution need to be updated to support concurrent mode prior to release.
So please create corresponding task for it.

@AliakseiLiasnitski AliakseiLiasnitski merged commit 84d5c92 into develop May 28, 2024
2 checks passed
@AliakseiLiasnitski AliakseiLiasnitski deleted the feat/EPMRPP-90161 branch May 28, 2024 09:01
@aviadhadidainx
Copy link

Any update when this suppose to be released?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants