Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency @portabletext/block-tools to ^1.1.0 #8285

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: next
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 16, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@portabletext/block-tools (source) ^1.0.2 -> ^1.1.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

portabletext/editor (@​portabletext/block-tools)

v1.1.0

Features
  • allow passing keyGenerator to htmlToBlocks and normalizeBlock (e8a4502)
Bug Fixes
  • deps: update sanity monorepo to ^3.70.0 (b345181)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate using a curated preset maintained by Sanity. View repository job log here

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner January 16, 2025 09:21
@renovate renovate bot requested review from cngonzalez and removed request for a team January 16, 2025 09:21
@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge January 16, 2025 09:21
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 16, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 17, 2025 7:53pm
performance-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 17, 2025 7:53pm
test-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 17, 2025 7:53pm
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 17, 2025 7:53pm
test-next-studio ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jan 17, 2025 7:53pm

Copy link
Contributor

No changes to documentation

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 16, 2025

Component Testing Report Updated Jan 17, 2025 7:56 PM (UTC)

❌ Failed Tests (1) -- expand for details
File Status Duration Passed Skipped Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 6s 15 0 0
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 12s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 1m 20s 5 0 1
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 50s 11 7 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 12 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 25s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 14s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 6s 15 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 46s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 2m 1s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 13s 3 9 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 42s 21 0 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 16, 2025

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Fri, 17 Jan 2025 19:58:34 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 20.4 efps (49ms) 17.7 efps (57ms) +8ms (+15.3%)
article (body) 56.5 efps (18ms) 59.5 efps (17ms) -1ms (-5.1%)
article (string inside object) 21.3 efps (47ms) 22.7 efps (44ms) -3ms (-6.4%)
article (string inside array) 19.2 efps (52ms) 19.6 efps (51ms) -1ms (-1.9%)

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 49ms 56ms 84ms 399ms 931ms 10.9s
article (body) 18ms 20ms 27ms 58ms 137ms 5.7s
article (string inside object) 47ms 53ms 60ms 228ms 501ms 7.8s
article (string inside array) 52ms 55ms 61ms 239ms 811ms 8.1s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 57ms 71ms 82ms 499ms 1153ms 11.8s
article (body) 17ms 19ms 22ms 44ms 261ms 5.7s
article (string inside object) 44ms 48ms 54ms 183ms 270ms 7.4s
article (string inside array) 51ms 55ms 66ms 355ms 800ms 8.3s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/portabletext-block-tools-1.x branch from 7984dbc to f85eb33 Compare January 16, 2025 09:53
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/portabletext-block-tools-1.x branch from f85eb33 to 3b187dd Compare January 16, 2025 13:16
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/portabletext-block-tools-1.x branch from 3b187dd to 7408bb8 Compare January 16, 2025 14:24
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/portabletext-block-tools-1.x branch 2 times, most recently from ce173b2 to 5650010 Compare January 16, 2025 15:40
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/portabletext-block-tools-1.x branch from 35f705a to b00fc27 Compare January 17, 2025 08:47
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/portabletext-block-tools-1.x branch from b00fc27 to 774a4af Compare January 17, 2025 11:15
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/portabletext-block-tools-1.x branch from 774a4af to d81537c Compare January 17, 2025 13:16
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/portabletext-block-tools-1.x branch from d81537c to 196a00f Compare January 17, 2025 18:00
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/portabletext-block-tools-1.x branch from 196a00f to 8a383ad Compare January 17, 2025 18:21
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/portabletext-block-tools-1.x branch from 8a383ad to e91f0b3 Compare January 17, 2025 19:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants