Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(core): run tests [do not merge] #8325

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

pedrobonamin
Copy link
Contributor

Description

What to review

Testing

Notes for release

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 20, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
performance-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 20, 2025 6:51am
test-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 20, 2025 6:51am
3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jan 20, 2025 6:51am
test-next-studio ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jan 20, 2025 6:51am
page-building-studio ⬜️ Skipped (Inspect) Jan 20, 2025 6:51am

Copy link
Contributor

No changes to documentation

Copy link
Contributor

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Mon, 20 Jan 2025 06:58:57 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 25.6 efps (39ms) 29.9 efps (34ms) -6ms (-14.1%)
article (body) 72.2 efps (14ms) 78.1 efps (13ms) -1ms (-/-%)
article (string inside object) 26.3 efps (38ms) 30.3 efps (33ms) -5ms (-13.2%)
article (string inside array) 25.6 efps (39ms) 27.0 efps (37ms) -2ms (-5.1%)
recipe (name) 52.6 efps (19ms) 62.5 efps (16ms) -3ms (-15.8%)
recipe (description) 58.8 efps (17ms) 66.7 efps (15ms) -2ms (-11.8%)
recipe (instructions) 99.9+ efps (5ms) 99.9+ efps (5ms) +0ms (-/-%)
synthetic (title) 20.0 efps (50ms) 20.8 efps (48ms) -2ms (-4.0%)
synthetic (string inside object) 19.2 efps (52ms) 20.8 efps (48ms) -4ms (-7.7%)

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 39ms 58ms 64ms 506ms 891ms 10.7s
article (body) 14ms 17ms 21ms 66ms 83ms 5.0s
article (string inside object) 38ms 39ms 52ms 120ms 335ms 6.9s
article (string inside array) 39ms 40ms 43ms 148ms 137ms 6.4s
recipe (name) 19ms 21ms 26ms 39ms 0ms 7.5s
recipe (description) 17ms 18ms 20ms 30ms 0ms 4.3s
recipe (instructions) 5ms 6ms 7ms 8ms 0ms 3.0s
synthetic (title) 50ms 53ms 55ms 128ms 397ms 12.8s
synthetic (string inside object) 52ms 54ms 62ms 406ms 938ms 8.4s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 34ms 36ms 54ms 368ms 219ms 11.2s
article (body) 13ms 14ms 16ms 82ms 64ms 4.6s
article (string inside object) 33ms 35ms 39ms 282ms 240ms 6.8s
article (string inside array) 37ms 39ms 43ms 170ms 163ms 6.6s
recipe (name) 16ms 17ms 20ms 39ms 0ms 6.7s
recipe (description) 15ms 16ms 18ms 33ms 0ms 4.4s
recipe (instructions) 5ms 6ms 7ms 8ms 0ms 3.0s
synthetic (title) 48ms 52ms 66ms 334ms 755ms 12.6s
synthetic (string inside object) 48ms 52ms 58ms 166ms 990ms 8.3s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

Copy link
Contributor

Component Testing Report Updated Jan 20, 2025 6:59 AM (UTC)

❌ Failed Tests (2) -- expand for details
File Status Duration Passed Skipped Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 7s 15 0 0
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 13s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 1m 20s 5 0 1
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 50s 11 7 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 12 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 25s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 14s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 1m 6s 5 0 1
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 6s 15 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 38s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 2m 7s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 13s 3 9 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 28s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 48s 21 0 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant