Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
soundwire: stream: skip m_rt which is not in preparing stage #5246
soundwire: stream: skip m_rt which is not in preparing stage #5246
Changes from all commits
b1cbc68
6f676f9
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
no need for an else after a continue btw
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We still need an else because it will not continue if m_rt->stream == stream and stream->state == SDW_STREAM_CONFIGURED and it will then continue because m_rt->stream->state != SDW_STREAM_ENABLED && m_rt->stream->state != SDW_STREAM_DISABLED.
We only want to check m_rt->stream->state != SDW_STREAM_ENABLED && m_rt->stream->state != SDW_STREAM_DISABLED when the m_rt->stream != stream.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
and this is not intuitive at all. What are you trying to say here? Ignore a runtime thats not associated with the stream if it has already been activated once?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, to the opposite. Only calculate the bandwidth of the active streams, and add the bandwidth of the current stream.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok then the check for != ENABLED makes sense. but why also check for != DISABLED? Is this the case with open but paused streams? Anyway, I think this needs a comment here with the explanation. And the commit message needs to be modified too based on whatever explanation you add here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, DISABLED is about paused. Please see https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/blob/topic/sof-dev/Documentation/driver-api/soundwire/stream.rst#soundwire-stream-states and https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/blob/topic/sof-dev/sound/soc/sdw_utils/soc_sdw_utils.c#L809