Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update ReferenceImplementation.md #105

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 19, 2024

Conversation

zachzeus
Copy link
Contributor

@zachzeus zachzeus commented Jun 5, 2024

Here are the links to the initial reference components.

NOTE: These tools are in active development and may not be ready for use.

Here are the links to the initial reference components.

Signed-off-by: zachzeus <[email protected]>
@onthebreeze
Copy link
Contributor

I suggest we switch the link resolver reference from the GS1 DLR (which works only for GS1 keys) with a pointer to https://github.com/uncefact/project-digitallink - noting that it's empty but that work will kick off in July

Copy link
Contributor

@PatStLouis PatStLouis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this a reference implementation or an implementer's toolkit?

@philarcher
Copy link
Contributor

See my PR #114. I'm suggesting the term "Identity Resolver" rather than anything with 'Digital Link' in the title.

@zachzeus
Copy link
Contributor Author

zachzeus commented Jun 18, 2024

Hi @onthebreeze - should we create a new repo for the new project - something like 'project-identity-resolver' - I've updated to reflect that.

This update is to fix DLR to Identity Resolver and to point out at a new project called 'project-identity-resolver'.

Signed-off-by: zachzeus <[email protected]>
@zachzeus
Copy link
Contributor Author

zachzeus commented Jun 18, 2024

@PatStLouis - I think you're right it is more like an implementers toolkit at this point. I'd be interested in your perspective on the difference.

The main thing that I'm considering here is that I don't think that the tools we're pointing at now will be the only tools that will be developed.

So reference implementation was chosen to signal that you don't need to use these tools to be a UNTP implementer.

Copy link
Contributor

@onthebreeze onthebreeze left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's ok as a starting point. I think it needs more context about how these parts fit together and where implementers can substitute their own products.

@zachzeus zachzeus merged commit 98ad115 into main Jun 19, 2024
1 check passed
@kshychko kshychko deleted the Iniital-reference-implementation-components branch December 10, 2024 09:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants