Feature/data manager user fix

[solomon-negusse]

Pull request checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

• Make sure you are requesting to pull a topic/feature/bugfix branch (right side). Don't request your master!
• Make sure you are making a pull request against the develop branch (left side). Also you should start your branch off our develop.
• Check the commit's or even all commits' message styles matches our requested structure.
• Check your code additions will fail neither code linting checks nor unit test.

Pull request type

Please check the type of change your PR introduces:

• Bugfix
• Feature
• Code style update (formatting, renaming)
• Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
• Build related changes
• Documentation content changes
• Other (please describe):

What is the current behavior?

The pydantic model for the user doesn't match the response of {rw-api}/auth/check-logged response

What is the new behavior?

Does this introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

Other information

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.88%. Comparing base (1796f60) to head (d80fcfc).

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           feature/data_manager     #514   +/-   ##
=====================================================
  Coverage                 81.87%   81.88%           
=====================================================
  Files                       125      125           
  Lines                      5562     5563    +1     
=====================================================
+ Hits                       4554     4555    +1     
  Misses                     1008     1008           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	81.88% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[danscales]

I don't see providerId listed in https://resource-watch.github.io/doc-api/reference.html#get-lt-base-api-url-gt-auth-check-logged . Is that documentation out of date? If it is not being returned by 'check-logged', can you put a comment in on why you're adding it?

Also, it looks like 'updatedAt' is returned by 'checked-logged'. Do you want to include that for completeness?

[solomon-negusse]

I had one unpushed commit that makes providerId optional as it's only present when provider represents third party auth (facebook, google, etc). Thanks for catching it.
Also updatedAt is not present in the actual response.
The documentation looks incorrect/incomplete in both cases.