Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: Move epsilon_closure and nfa_to_dfa from Lexer class to Dfa class. #71

Open
wants to merge 479 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SharafMohamed
Copy link
Contributor

@SharafMohamed SharafMohamed commented Jan 8, 2025

References

  • Depends on PR#61.
  • To review in parallel with PR#61, diff against PR#61 locally. In the repo run:
git fetch upstream pull/61/head:pr-61
git fetch upstream pull/62/head:pr-71
git diff pr-61 pr-71

Description

  • Move epsilon_closure from Lexer class to NfaState class.
  • Move functionality from nfa_to_dfa in Lexer class to Dfa class constructor.

Validation performed

Previously existing tests succeed.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • Refactor

    • Updated method signatures to use modern C++ auto return type syntax across multiple classes
    • Simplified type declarations using auto for local variables
    • Removed deprecated methods related to NFA-to-DFA conversion
  • Performance

    • Improved memory management by using smart pointers and move semantics
    • Added new constructor for direct DFA creation from NFA
    • Enhanced state transition handling in finite automata classes
  • Code Quality

    • Added epsilon_closure() method to improve state transition tracking
    • Streamlined code by removing unnecessary pointer management
    • Improved type inference and readability of method signatures

SharafMohamed and others added 30 commits November 13, 2024 17:32
Co-authored-by: Lin Zhihao <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Lin Zhihao <[email protected]>
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several modifications across multiple files in the log_surgeon library, focusing on modernizing C++ code syntax and simplifying object management. Key changes include updating method signatures to use auto return types, removing unique pointer usage, and introducing a new constructor in the Dfa class for converting NFAs to DFAs. The modifications aim to improve type inference, resource management, and code readability without fundamentally altering the underlying logic of the existing implementations.

Changes

File Change Summary
examples/intersect-test.cpp Updated parameter type for get_intersect_for_query from unique pointer to constant reference; modified DFA object creation and method calls
src/log_surgeon/Buffer.hpp Updated copy method signature to use auto -> void return type
src/log_surgeon/Lalr1Parser.tpp Converted multiple method signatures to use auto -> void/return_type; replaced explicit type declarations with auto
src/log_surgeon/Lexer.hpp Removed nfa_to_dfa and epsilon_closure method declarations
src/log_surgeon/Lexer.tpp Updated method signatures and variable declarations to use auto; modified DFA instantiation method
src/log_surgeon/LogEvent.cpp, LogParser.cpp, Schema.cpp, SchemaParser.cpp Updated method signatures and variable declarations to use auto
src/log_surgeon/finite_automata/Dfa.hpp Added new constructor for creating DFA from NFA
src/log_surgeon/finite_automata/NfaState.hpp Added epsilon_closure() method

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • LinZhihao-723

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/log_surgeon/finite_automata/NfaState.hpp (1)

97-100: Documentation could be more descriptive.

While the documentation indicates the return value, it would be beneficial to include:

  • The method's purpose
  • Time complexity
  • Whether the method modifies the state

Consider expanding the documentation:

 /**
+ * Computes the epsilon closure of the current state using depth-first traversal.
+ * The epsilon closure includes all states reachable through epsilon transitions and
+ * tagged transitions (as per TODO comment in implementation).
+ * 
+ * Time complexity: O(V + E) where V is the number of states and E is the number
+ * of transitions.
+ * 
+ * @note This method does not modify the current state.
  * @return The set of all states reachable from the current state via epsilon transitions.
  */
src/log_surgeon/Lexer.tpp (1)

382-382: Consider documenting the DFA construction behaviour.

The TODO comment indicates that the DFA ignores tags, which is an important implementation detail that should be documented more formally.

Consider adding a formal documentation comment:

+    /**
+     * Generates a DFA from the NFA, ignoring tags.
+     * @note Currently, tags are ignored in the DFA construction. For example,
+     * "capture:user=(?<user_id>\d+)" is treated as "capture:user=\d+"
+     */
     m_dfa = std::make_unique<finite_automata::Dfa<TypedDfaState>>(std::move(nfa));
src/log_surgeon/finite_automata/Dfa.hpp (2)

17-17: Consider accepting nfa by rvalue reference to improve performance

Currently, the constructor accepts Nfa<NfaStateType> nfa by value, which may introduce unnecessary copying. If the intention is to transfer ownership of nfa, consider accepting it by rvalue reference (Nfa<NfaStateType>&& nfa) and moving it to avoid unnecessary copies.


46-46: Use using instead of typedef for type aliasing

To adhere to modern C++ conventions, consider replacing typedef with using for type aliasing:

-        typedef std::set<TypedNfaState const*> StateSet;
+        using StateSet = std::set<TypedNfaState const*>;
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 51d11cc and 239872a.

📒 Files selected for processing (13)
  • examples/intersect-test.cpp (3 hunks)
  • src/log_surgeon/Buffer.hpp (1 hunks)
  • src/log_surgeon/Lalr1Parser.tpp (26 hunks)
  • src/log_surgeon/Lexer.hpp (0 hunks)
  • src/log_surgeon/Lexer.tpp (10 hunks)
  • src/log_surgeon/LogEvent.cpp (2 hunks)
  • src/log_surgeon/LogParser.cpp (1 hunks)
  • src/log_surgeon/Parser.tpp (2 hunks)
  • src/log_surgeon/ParserInputBuffer.cpp (2 hunks)
  • src/log_surgeon/Schema.cpp (1 hunks)
  • src/log_surgeon/SchemaParser.cpp (2 hunks)
  • src/log_surgeon/finite_automata/Dfa.hpp (2 hunks)
  • src/log_surgeon/finite_automata/NfaState.hpp (3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/log_surgeon/Lexer.hpp
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
  • src/log_surgeon/LogEvent.cpp
  • src/log_surgeon/Schema.cpp
  • src/log_surgeon/SchemaParser.cpp
  • src/log_surgeon/LogParser.cpp
  • src/log_surgeon/Buffer.hpp
  • src/log_surgeon/ParserInputBuffer.cpp
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
src/log_surgeon/finite_automata/NfaState.hpp (1)

Pattern **/*.{cpp,hpp,java,js,jsx,ts,tsx}: - Prefer false == <expression> rather than !<expression>.

src/log_surgeon/finite_automata/Dfa.hpp (1)

Pattern **/*.{cpp,hpp,java,js,jsx,ts,tsx}: - Prefer false == <expression> rather than !<expression>.

examples/intersect-test.cpp (1)

Pattern **/*.{cpp,hpp,java,js,jsx,ts,tsx}: - Prefer false == <expression> rather than !<expression>.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, Release)
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, Debug)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/log_surgeon/finite_automata/NfaState.hpp (2)

8-8: LGTM!

The addition of the <stack> header is necessary for the new epsilon_closure() method implementation.


174-207: Review the TODO comment and tagged transitions handling.

The implementation treats tagged transitions as epsilon transitions (line 189), but this is marked as a TODO. This design decision should be reviewed as it might affect the correctness of the epsilon closure computation.

Let's verify the usage of tagged transitions:

Additionally:

  1. The implementation correctly handles cycles using a visited set (closure_set).
  2. The use of false == stack.empty() and false == closure_set.insert(current_state).second follows the coding guidelines for boolean comparisons.
✅ Verification successful

The treatment of tagged transitions as epsilon transitions is intentional and correct.

The TODO comment appears to be a documentation note rather than a pending task. This behaviour is:

  • Part of the regex capture group implementation design
  • Well-documented in RegexAST.hpp
  • Consistently implemented across the codebase
  • Validated by tests
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other implementations or tests that rely on this behaviour
rg -A 5 "tagged.*transition.*epsilon" --type cpp

Length of output: 619


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for tests involving tagged transitions
rg -l "TaggedTransition" test/
# Search for documentation about tagged transitions
fd README.md | xargs rg "tagged.*transition" -A 3
# Search for related discussions in comments
rg "tagged.*transition" --type cpp -g "!test/*" -A 3

Length of output: 25622

src/log_surgeon/Lexer.tpp (2)

22-22: LGTM! Consistent use of trailing return types.

The change to use auto -> void for method return types is consistent with modern C++ practices and improves readability.

Also applies to: 69-72, 78-81, 86-89, 153-153, 163-163, 213-214, 270-270, 302-302, 379-380, 416-416, 422-422, 428-428, 645-645


45-45: LGTM! Consistent use of auto for variable declarations.

The change to use auto for variable declarations improves maintainability and follows modern C++ type inference practices.

Also applies to: 69-71, 85-85, 177-177, 201-201, 241-241, 256-256, 277-278, 283-286, 303-304, 321-322, 335-338, 348-351, 366-368, 382-383, 390-393, 407-408, 429-432, 477-477, 519-519, 559-559, 575-579, 582-583, 594-594, 612-614, 629-629, 638-638, 661-661, 666-666, 691-692, 714-714, 735-736

src/log_surgeon/Lalr1Parser.tpp (1)

69-72: LGTM! Consistent modernization of C++ syntax.

The changes to use trailing return types and auto for variable declarations are consistent with modern C++ practices and improve code maintainability.

Also applies to: 78-81, 86-89, 153-153, 163-166, 173-177, 182-184, 213-214, 220-220, 241-243, 270-270, 277-278, 283-286, 302-304, 308-308, 321-322, 335-338, 348-351, 366-368, 379-380, 383-383, 390-393, 407-408, 416-416, 422-422, 428-430, 432-432, 440-440, 477-477, 519-519, 530-530, 559-559, 575-579, 582-583, 594-594, 612-614, 629-629, 638-638, 645-645, 661-661, 666-666, 691-692, 714-714, 735-736

src/log_surgeon/Parser.tpp (1)

33-36: Use of auto with trailing return type -> void is acceptable

While using auto with a trailing return type for functions returning void may be unconventional, it's acceptable if it aligns with the project's coding style. Consistency across the codebase can enhance readability.

examples/intersect-test.cpp (1)

44-44: Confirm safety of moving nfa into dfa2

At line 44, nfa is moved into dfa2 using std::move(nfa). Please ensure that nfa is not used after this operation to prevent undefined behaviour.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant