Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

drivers: pinctrl: stm32: Ignore NO_REMAP pins when handling AFIO remaps #83512

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

zyp
Copy link

@zyp zyp commented Jan 2, 2025

Some peripherals (e.g. ethernet) have remaps only on some of the pins. Pins without remaps do not conflict and must be ignored to correctly process the remaps.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2025

Hello @zyp, and thank you very much for your first pull request to the Zephyr project!
Our Continuous Integration pipeline will execute a series of checks on your Pull Request commit messages and code, and you are expected to address any failures by updating the PR. Please take a look at our commit message guidelines to find out how to format your commit messages, and at our contribution workflow to understand how to update your Pull Request. If you haven't already, please make sure to review the project's Contributor Expectations and update (by amending and force-pushing the commits) your pull request if necessary.
If you are stuck or need help please join us on Discord and ask your question there. Additionally, you can escalate the review when applicable. 😊

Some peripherals (e.g. ethernet) have remaps only on some of the pins.
Pins without remaps do not conflict and must be ignored to correctly
process the remaps.

Signed-off-by: Vegard Storheil Eriksen <[email protected]>
@zyp zyp force-pushed the stm32_afio_remap branch from c9fd403 to 0eb403c Compare January 4, 2025 10:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants