Get Started section #526
Get Started section #526
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request involves the systematic removal of multiple documentation files across various modules in the system architecture. These files, located in the Changes
The changes represent a comprehensive removal of architectural documentation across multiple system modules, potentially indicating a documentation reorganization or migration strategy. Additionally, updates to messaging and navigation enhance user experience and accessibility to information about ZetaChain. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/pages/_meta.json (1)
6-9: Consider enhancing the "Get Started" section metadataThe addition of the "start" section is well-structured. Consider adding a
navImgUrlproperty to maintain consistency with other sections like "nodes" that have visual indicators."start": { "title": "Get Started", "description": "Start building on ZetaChain." + "navImgUrl": "/img/pages/get-started.svg" },src/components/shared/components/Layout/Layout.constants.tsx (1)
76-82: Consider using a distinct icon for Get Started sectionThe new navigation item is well-placed, but it currently shares the same icon (IconAbout) with the About section. Consider using a more appropriate icon like IconWelcome or creating a new IconGetStarted to better differentiate these sections.
{ label: "Get Started", - icon: IconAbout, + icon: IconWelcome, url: "/start", },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
src/components/Home/components/HomeHero.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/shared/components/Layout/Layout.constants.tsx(1 hunks)src/pages/_meta.json(2 hunks)src/pages/index.mdx(1 hunks)src/pages/start/_meta.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/pages/start/_meta.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/Home/components/HomeHero.tsx (2)
20-21: LGTM! Clear and impactful messaging.The updated copy effectively communicates ZetaChain's unique value proposition, emphasizing its universal blockchain capabilities and cross-chain accessibility.
25-26: LGTM! Strong developer-focused messaging.The revised text successfully highlights ZetaChain's technical capabilities while maintaining accessibility. The emphasis on the Universal EVM and developer empowerment aligns well with the platform's technical documentation focus.
| import { HomeHero, HomeNavigationSections } from "~/components/Home"; | ||
| import { GetSupport } from "~/components/Support"; | ||
|
|
||
| <HomeHero /> | ||
|
|
||
| <div className="flex flex-col gap-20 sm:gap-[120px]"> | ||
| <GetStarted /> | ||
| <HomeNavigationSections /> | ||
| <GetSupport /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Remove unused GetStarted component
The navigation flow has been successfully restructured through the HomeNavigationSections component. However, the GetStarted component is now unused and should be removed from:
- src/components/Home/components/GetStarted.tsx
- Remove the export from src/components/Home/index.ts
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify navigation flow after GetStarted component removal
The removal of the GetStarted component should be balanced by the new navigation item added in Layout.constants.tsx. Please ensure that users can still easily find the getting started information through the new navigation path.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any remaining references to the GetStarted component
rg -l "GetStarted" src/
Length of output: 98
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for GetStarted component usage
rg "GetStarted" src/ -A 2
# Check navigation structure in Layout.constants
rg -A 10 "navigation.*=" src/layout/Layout.constants.tsx
Length of output: 630
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find navigation-related files
fd -t f -i "nav|route" src/
# Search for navigation configuration patterns
rg -i "const.*navigation|const.*routes" src/
Length of output: 4623
|
@zeta-chain/fullstack I'm trying to add a "Get Started" section to the sidebar. On localnet it displays fine (both with 
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
src/pages/start/_meta.json(1 hunks)src/pages/start/app.mdx(1 hunks)src/pages/start/build.mdx(1 hunks)src/pages/start/evm.mdx(1 hunks)src/pages/start/index.mdx(1 hunks)src/pages/start/zetachain.mdx(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- src/pages/start/zetachain.mdx
- src/pages/start/build.mdx
- src/pages/start/app.mdx
- src/pages/start/evm.mdx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/pages/start/_meta.json (2)
3-4: Section titles are clear and descriptive.The titles for each section provide a good progression from introduction to specific features.
Also applies to: 7-8, 11-12, 15-16, 19-20
1-22: Verify JSON structure for Nextra sidebar.The JSON structure appears correct, but given the reported issue where nested items aren't appearing in Vercel deployment, please verify the following:
- Ensure the
_meta.jsonfile is in the correct directory structure- Check if Nextra configuration in
next.config.jshas the correct theme settings- Verify that the corresponding
.mdxfiles exist for each section✅ Verification successful
JSON structure is correct for Nextra sidebar
The file structure, configuration, and corresponding .mdx files are all properly set up. The issue with nested items not appearing in Vercel deployment is likely unrelated to the _meta.json structure or file organization.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of required files and configuration # Check if all corresponding .mdx files exist echo "Checking .mdx files..." for page in index zetachain build evm app; do fd "^${page}.mdx$" src/pages/start done # Check Nextra configuration echo "Checking Nextra configuration..." cat next.config.jsLength of output: 2506
src/pages/start/index.mdx (2)
6-7: LGTM! Clean and consistent imports.The imports follow the project's conventions using the "~" alias prefix.
9-12: Verify component rendering in production build.The layout structure is clean, but there's a reported issue where nested items don't appear in the Vercel deployment. This might be related to how
CurrentPageNavigationSectionsrenders in production.Let's verify the component's configuration:
Consider adding debug logging in
CurrentPageNavigationSectionsto trace the rendering flow in production:<div className="flex flex-col gap-20 sm:gap-[120px]"> + {/* Debug: Add temporary logging */} + {console.log('Rendering navigation sections:', process.env.NODE_ENV)} <CurrentPageNavigationSections /> <GetSupport /> </div>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/components/shared/components/Layout/components/NavigationAccordionLink.tsx (1)
23-27: Consider making isTopLevelPage required to prevent ambiguity.The
isTopLevelPageproperty is optional, which could lead to inconsistent visual hierarchy if not explicitly set.type NavigationAccordionLinkProps = PropsWithChildren<{ page: Page; onClick?: () => void; - isTopLevelPage?: boolean; + isTopLevelPage: boolean; }>;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
src/components/shared/components/Layout/components/NavigationAccordionLink.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/shared/components/Layout/components/NavigationLayout.tsx(1 hunks)src/pages/start/build.mdx(1 hunks)src/pages/start/zetachain.mdx(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- src/pages/start/build.mdx
- src/pages/start/zetachain.mdx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/shared/components/Layout/components/NavigationAccordionLink.tsx (1)
85-92: Verify styling consistency across different themes and viewports.The dot indicator's styling and positioning might need adjustment for better visibility and alignment across different themes and screen sizes.
✅ Verification successful
Styling implementation verified and found to be consistent
The dot indicator's styling follows the design system's patterns with proper theme support and responsive adjustments. The implementation handles different viewports and themes appropriately.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential styling inconsistencies across themes # Look for other dot indicators or similar visual hierarchies # Search for similar styling patterns rg -l 'w-1\s+h-1.*ml-1\s+mr-2\s+mt-2' . rg -l 'bg-green-100.*bg-grey-200.*bg-grey-600' . # Check for theme-related classes rg -l 'dark:bg-grey-[0-9]' .Length of output: 1156
src/components/shared/components/Layout/components/NavigationLayout.tsx (1)
92-97: Investigate deployment inconsistency with nested items.The nested items visibility issue in Vercel might be related to SSR/CSR differences or state management. Consider the following:
- Add debug logging for page structure during SSR and CSR
- Verify navSection.children filtering behavior
- Ensure state is properly hydrated during SSR
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation Removal
New Features
Content Update