-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[16.0][MIG] l10n_be_cooperator_national_number #119
[16.0][MIG] l10n_be_cooperator_national_number #119
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Carmen Bianca BAKKER <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Carmen Bianca BAKKER <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Carmen Bianca BAKKER <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Carmen Bianca BAKKER <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Carmen Bianca BAKKER <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Carmen Bianca BAKKER <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Carmen Bianca BAKKER <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Carmen Bianca BAKKER <[email protected]>
…any_default_get() Signed-off-by: Carmen Bianca BAKKER <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Carmen Bianca BAKKER <[email protected]>
In some scenarios, the migration is run on a database that does not yet have the requisite fields in the database. By making it a post-migration script, we avoid the problem. Signed-off-by: Carmen Bianca BAKKER <[email protected]>
…eld to res.partner
…when not required
4c347c2
to
656be6b
Compare
656be6b
to
3f2b5ef
Compare
rather than on l10n_be_national_number (in v14)
3f2b5ef
to
39bdd4d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Successful functional test
@carmenbianca Could you review this? and if you have the power, approve the pr? |
Signed-off-by: Carmen Bianca BAKKER <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
made one adjustment, LGTM
l10n_be_cooperator_national_number/models/subscription_request.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
/ocabot merge nobump |
On my way to merge this fine PR! |
@carmenbianca your merge command was aborted due to failed check(s), which you can inspect on this commit of 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-119-by-carmenbianca-bump-nobump. After fixing the problem, you can re-issue a merge command. Please refrain from merging manually as it will most probably make the target branch red. |
1 similar comment
@carmenbianca your merge command was aborted due to failed check(s), which you can inspect on this commit of 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-119-by-carmenbianca-bump-nobump. After fixing the problem, you can re-issue a merge command. Please refrain from merging manually as it will most probably make the target branch red. |
/ocabot merge nobump |
What a great day to merge this nice PR. Let's do it! |
Congratulations, your PR was merged at 5c1327b. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ |
Internal task : https://gestion.coopiteasy.be/web#id=12260&model=project.task&view_type=form&menu_id=
Now depends on l10n_be_partner_identification rather than l10n_be_national_number